GitHub のAIペアプログラマー — インライン補完、チャット、そしてPRを自動作成する新しいAgent モードを搭載。
コード実行ツール利用メモリ
Demo · hover to play
Continue vs Sourcegraph Codywhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Open-source coding agent for VS Code and JetBrains — bring your own model, customize every prompt.
CodeTool useMemory
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Continue | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Continue
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 10
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Continue
メリット
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
デメリット
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
Sourcegraph Cody
メリット
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
デメリット
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
Continue
Open source
無料
Engineers + teams
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
おすすめ
Hub
$20/月
Teams sharing config
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
Sourcegraph Cody
Free
無料
Personal use
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
おすすめ
Pro
$9/月
Solo devs
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/席/月
Engineering teams
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Continue
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Continue →Sourcegraph Cody
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Continue or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Continue for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Continue and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Continue starts at Free · OSS; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Continue is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Continue or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Continue and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Continue and Sourcegraph Cody also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
AWS のエンタープライズ向け AIエージェント — コーディングアシスタント、ビジネスチャット、AWS データに基づくカスタマイズ可能な Q アプリ。
コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリDemo · hover to playコードベース全体を把握した上で動作する自律的なコーディングエージェント — 深いコンテキストを活用したマルチファイル編集。
コード実行ツール利用メモリRAG
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Continue · alternatives to Sourcegraph Cody
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison