KI-Kundenservice-Agent — löst Tickets über Chat, E-Mail und Sprache mit messbaren Ticket-Deflection-Raten.
RAGTool-NutzungMemorySprache
Demo · hover to play
Decagon vs PolyAIwhich AI support agent should you pick in 2026?
Conversational support agents that resolve tickets like your best reps.
Tool useMemoryRAG
Decagon vs PolyAI — specs
| Spec | Decagon | PolyAI |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 73 / 100 (A) | 73 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Voice, Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Sep 2024 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Decagon
Agent Rank
73/ 100
- Autonomie
- 9
- Fähigkeiten
- 6
- Integrationen
- 4
- Preise
- 9
- Reife
- 6
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 10
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
PolyAI
Agent Rank
73/ 100
- Autonomie
- 9
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 4
- Preise
- 9
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 7
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Pros & cons
Decagon
Pros
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
Cons
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
PolyAI
Pricing
Decagon
Growth
Individuell
Mid-market
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
Empfohlen
Enterprise
Individuell
Enterprise
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
PolyAI
Which one should you pick?
Decagon
Pick Decagon if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Decagon →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Decagon or PolyAI in 2026?+
Pick Decagon if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick PolyAI if its specific capabilities (Voice, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Decagon for primary work and PolyAI for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Decagon and PolyAI?+
Both Decagon and PolyAI start in the same pricing range (Subscription · Free tier vs Subscription · Free tier). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Decagon or PolyAI?+
Both Decagon and PolyAI are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Decagon and PolyAI also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
Multilingual customer-support AI agents with local deployment teams in 30 countries.
Tool-NutzungMemorySpracheRAGLösungsbasierter KI-Agent, direkt in Intercom integriert — Abrechnung nur für tatsächlich deflektierte Anfragen.
RAGTool-NutzungMemoryDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Decagon · alternatives to PolyAI
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison