Agent IA de service client — résout les tickets via chat, e-mail et voix avec des taux de ticket deflection mesurables.
Decagon vs Torqwhich AI support agent should you pick in 2026?
Conversational support agents that resolve tickets like your best reps.
Decagon vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Decagon | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 73 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomie
- 9
- Capacités
- 6
- Intégrations
- 4
- Tarification
- 9
- Maturité
- 6
- Vérifiabilité
- 10
Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?
- Autonomie
- 9
- Capacités
- 8
- Intégrations
- 6
- Tarification
- 4
- Maturité
- 7
- Vérifiabilité
- 6
Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?
Pros & cons
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Decagon →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Decagon or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Decagon for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Decagon and Torq?+
Decagon starts at Subscription · Free tier; Torq starts at Subscription. Decagon is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Decagon or Torq?+
Both Decagon and Torq are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Decagon and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- RAGTool UseMemoryVoixDemo · hover to play
Multilingual customer-support AI agents with local deployment teams in 30 countries.
Tool UseMemoryVoixRAGAgent IA basé sur la résolution, intégré à Intercom — vous payez uniquement ce qu'il résout réellement.
RAGTool UseMemoryDemo · hover to play