Agent Rankの内訳
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 10
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 9
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
機能
- ブラウザ操作
- ツール利用
- コード実行
- メモリ
- RAG
連携
- Gmail
- Docs / wiki
- Notion
- Storage
- Google Drive
料金プラン
- +1日100クレジット
- +標準モデル
- +ブラウザ + Tool Use
- +無制限クレジット
- +プレミアムモデル
- +優先キュー
- +優先サポート
- +5席
- +共有ワークスペース
- +管理者コントロール
Our take on Manus
Manus is the closest thing to "a generalist AI employee" we've tested. One prompt in, a finished deliverable out — research reports, spreadsheets, slide decks, working web apps. Wildly capable; occasionally wildly off the rails.
- +Single prompt produces complete, formatted deliverables — not just chat replies
- +Genuine multi-step planning that runs for 10-30 minutes per task
- +Excellent at research-heavy work that ends in a structured artifact
- +File system + browser + code execution all integrated cleanly
- −Quality varies more than narrowly-scoped agents — best to budget rework time
- −Premium tier needed for the most capable runs; free tier is rate-limited
- −Confidence in output sometimes outpaces accuracy — verify everything
- −Cannot easily intervene mid-run; you wait until it finishes
- ·Research briefs, market analysis, competitor teardowns
- ·Building prototype web apps from a single specification
- ·Generating polished slide decks or reports for internal review
- ·Compliance-sensitive work — Manus runs in its own cloud, your data goes through it
- ·Long-form research with citations — double-check sources before sharing
What "general purpose" actually means
Most agents specialize: code, sales, support. Manus is positioned as the generalist — you describe an outcome ("build me a competitive analysis of the top 5 employee engagement tools, include a comparison matrix, and produce a 3-slide summary deck"), and Manus orchestrates browser research, document drafting, code execution, and file output to produce the artifact.
In our tests this works surprisingly well. The agent will browse, take notes, generate a structured comparison, render it to PDF or PPTX, and hand you a download link. End-to-end, without you steering each step.
The workflow
The interaction model is unusual:
- You write a single, detailed prompt.
- Manus generates a plan (you can review or edit it).
- It executes — often for 10 to 40 minutes.
- You receive a folder of deliverables: research notes, the final document, any intermediate code or data.
You don't chat with it mid-run. This is a deliberate design choice — by removing human-in-the-loop interruptions, Manus can plan longer horizons. The tradeoff is that when it goes off-rails, you pay for the full run before you can correct it.
Where it shines
Three task families consistently produce strong output:
-
Research-to-artifact pipelines. "Summarize the regulatory landscape for crypto in the EU as of May 2025" → 4,000 words with citations, a comparison table, and a one-page executive summary. Comparable to a junior analyst's first draft.
-
Prototype web apps. "Build a Next.js app that lets users upload a CSV and generates a chart from it" → working repo, deployable, with a README.
-
Slide decks from outlines. Hand it a bullet-point outline; receive a finished PowerPoint with consistent styling and basic data visualizations.
Where it stumbles
- Tasks requiring real-time iteration. If you'd normally say "wait, change that third paragraph," Manus's batch model fights you.
- Citation accuracy. Like all browse-and-summarize agents, Manus occasionally conflates sources or invents specifics. Verify every quote, every stat.
- Highly creative work. It will produce competent writing, not great writing.
Pricing
Free tier is rate-limited (a few runs per day, capped duration). The $19/mo Standard
plan unlocks longer runs and parallelism. The Pro plan ($39/mo) gives priority queue
and the best model access. With our coupon AGENTS20, the first month is 20% off.
Bottom line
Manus is the agent we'd hand the brief that says "I need this whole thing done by tomorrow and I don't care how." It's not the right tool for iterative work. Use it for batch deliverables and you'll be impressed; use it for collaboration and you'll be frustrated.
単一のプロンプトを完成した成果物に変える汎用エージェント。 フリーミアムプランから始めましょう。
よくある質問
Manus とは何で、何ができますか？+
Manus は完全自律型の汎用AIエージェントです。目標を指定すると — 市場調査、スプレッドシート作成、報告書の草案作成、複数ステップのWeb Workflow 実行など — 計画し、実行し、完了させます。2026年初頭にGAIAベンチマークで76%の精度でトップを記録。Starterサブスクリプションは月額$39。
Manus AI は月額$39の価値がありますか？+
週5回以上の多段階自律タスクを実行するユーザーにとっては、はい。同等の自律性に対するタスクあたりのコストは、ChatGPT Pro（月額$200）と比べて大幅に低くなります。ライトユーザーにとっては、月額$20のChatGPT PlusやPerplexity Proで、より低コストでほとんどのニーズに対応できます。
Manus と ChatGPT Agent のどちらが優れていますか？+
Manus は複数時間の自律タスク、GAIAスタイルのベンチマーク、コストで優位です。ChatGPT Agent は連携の深さ（Custom GPTs、Code Interpreter、音声）、エコシステム、コンシューマー向けの完成度で優位です。「目標を与えて放置する」自律的な作業にはManus。音声と幅広い機能を持つ日常的なアシスタントにはChatGPT。
ユーザーレビュー
レビューを書く →Be the first to review. We verify every reviewer by email.
