GitHub のAIペアプログラマー — インライン補完、チャット、そしてPRを自動作成する新しいAgent モードを搭載。
Continue vs Factory AIwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Open-source coding agent for VS Code and JetBrains — bring your own model, customize every prompt.
Autonomous "Droid" agent for end-to-end engineering with native AGENTS.md support.
Continue vs Factory AI — specs
| Spec | Continue | Factory AI |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription · from $40 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Oct 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 10
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
- +True end-to-end autonomy — Droid agent ships complete features without hand-holding
- +Native AGENTS.md adopter — fits modern repo conventions out of the box
- +Multi-agent coordination across linked repos for cross-service changes
- −Token-based pricing can spike on large refactors
- −Zed-first; JetBrains support newer, VS Code on roadmap
- −Less mature than Devin for very long-running autonomous sessions
Pricing
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
- +Droid autonomous agent
- +Zed + JetBrains
- +5M Standard Tokens/mo
- +Unlimited Droids
- +50M tokens/mo
- +Multi-agent coordination
- +Custom token volume
- +SSO + audit
- +Dedicated support
Which one should you pick?
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Continue →Pick Factory AI if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Factory AI →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Continue or Factory AI in 2026?+
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Factory AI if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Continue for primary work and Factory AI for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Continue and Factory AI?+
Continue starts at Free · OSS; Factory AI starts at Subscription · from $40. Continue is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Continue or Factory AI?+
Factory AI is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Continue and Factory AI also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- コード実行ツール利用メモリDemo · hover to play
AWS のエンタープライズ向け AIエージェント — コーディングアシスタント、ビジネスチャット、AWS データに基づくカスタマイズ可能な Q アプリ。
コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリDemo · hover to playコードベース全体を把握した上で動作する自律的なコーディングエージェント — 深いコンテキストを活用したマルチファイル編集。
コード実行ツール利用メモリRAG
Demo · hover to play