単一のプロンプトを完成した成果物に変える汎用エージェント。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用コード実行メモリ
AGENTS20を獲得コード
AGENTS20
Genspark vs Martinwhich AI research agent should you pick in 2026?
Multi-agent super-agent with built-in AI phone module — research, slides, sheets, real-world calls.
BrowserTool useVoiceMemory
Your personal AI chief of staff for inbox, calendar and life admin.
Tool useMemoryVoice
Genspark vs Martin — specs
| Spec | Genspark | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $25 | Subscription · from $25 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Voice, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, Voice |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Jul 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Genspark
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 10
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Martin
Agent Rank
72/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Genspark
メリット
- +$385M Series B Apr 2026 — among the highest-funded multi-agent platforms
- +Unique built-in AI phone module — agent can make real-world calls
- +Generates slides + sheets + research reports in a single prompt
デメリット
- −Hot-button branding — China-founded but US-based; geopolitical scrutiny possible
- −AI phone occasionally fails on heavily-accented English
- −Higher consumer pricing than Perplexity / You.com
Martin
メリット
- +AGENTS15 coupon makes the math obvious — $21/mo forever
- +Strong on Apple ecosystem (iMessage native)
- +Voice-memo intake feels effortless on iOS
デメリット
- −Microsoft 365 integration is the weak spot
- −No team plan; truly a personal assistant only
- −Limited custom workflow builder vs Lindy
Pricing
Genspark
Free
無料
Individuals
- +Super Agent
- +Limited AI phone calls
- +Standard speed
おすすめ
Plus
$25/月
Power users
- +Unlimited Super Agent
- +AI phone module
- +Priority compute
Pro
$200/月
Teams
- +Multiple agents in parallel
- +Shared workspaces
- +API access
Martin
おすすめ
Personal
$25/月
Individuals
- +Inbox + calendar
- +Voice memo intake
- +iMessage integration
- +AGENTS15 coupon: $21/mo forever
Pro
$49/月
Power users
- +Higher message limits
- +Custom workflows
- +Priority support
Which one should you pick?
Genspark
Pick Genspark if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Genspark →Martin
Pick Martin if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Claim AGENTS15Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Genspark or Martin in 2026?+
Pick Genspark if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Martin if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Genspark for primary work and Martin for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Genspark and Martin?+
Both Genspark and Martin start in the same pricing range (Freemium · from $25 vs Subscription · from $25). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Genspark or Martin?+
Genspark is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Genspark and Martin also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
Multi-agent orchestration platform from Japan — TRINITY model + finance underwriting agents.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
ChatGPT 内蔵のマルチステップリサーチエージェント — 自律的なブラウジングにより、5〜30分で引用情報豊富なレポートを生成します。
ブラウザ操作RAGメモリ
See more alternatives: alternatives to Genspark · alternatives to Martin
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison