"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
Glean vs Tines AIwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Enterprise AI worker — unified search, work assistant, and custom agents grounded in your company knowledge.
RAGMemoryTool use
Glean vs Tines AI — specs
| Spec | Glean | Tines AI |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 82 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | RAG, Memory, Tool use | Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 6 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Glean
Agent Rank
82/ 100
- 自律性
- 7
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 10
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Tines AI
Agent Rank
75/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 4
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Glean
メリット
- +Single best enterprise knowledge agent in 2026 — instant grounding in your company data
- +Custom Agents (Glean Agents) let teams build internal workflows without code
- +Strong permission-aware retrieval — agents see only what users are allowed to
デメリット
- −Enterprise-only — typically $50K+ ACV minimum
- −Initial connector setup takes weeks for full coverage
- −Pricier than ChatGPT Enterprise on a per-seat basis
Tines AI
メリット
- +Strongest human-in-the-loop story for security and IT workflows
- +Generous free tier (Community) is genuinely usable in production
- +Story-based composer is easier to read than YAML/JSON IaC alternatives
デメリット
- −Narrower scope than Zapier / n8n — built for SecOps + ITOps, less for marketing
- −Sales-led above Community tier; pricing not transparent
- −AI agent features are newer than the core automation product
Pricing
Glean
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Enterprises 200+ employees
- +Unified search across 100+ apps
- +Work assistant + custom agents
- +SSO + enterprise data isolation
Tines AI
Community
無料
Solo + small SOC
- +Unlimited workflows
- +Community connectors
- +Public-cloud only
おすすめ
Standard
カスタム
Mid-market
- +Production support
- +Custom connectors
- +On-prem option
Enterprise
カスタム
Enterprise SOC
- +Multi-region
- +SSO + audit
- +Premium support SLA
Which one should you pick?
Tines AI
Pick Tines AI if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Tines AI →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Glean or Tines AI in 2026?+
Pick Glean if its specific capabilities (RAG, Memory) match what you need. Pick Tines AI if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Glean for primary work and Tines AI for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Glean and Tines AI?+
Both Glean and Tines AI start in the same pricing range (Subscription · Free tier vs Subscription · Free tier). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Glean or Tines AI?+
Tines AI is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Glean and Tines AI also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
See more alternatives: alternatives to Glean · alternatives to Tines AI
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison