7,000以上のアプリ連携にAIエージェント層を追加 — 既存の自動化 stack に計画立案機能を加えます。
Make.com Agents vs Sardinewhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Make.com Agents vs Sardine — specs
| Spec | Make.com Agents | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 85 / 100 (S) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 8 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 10
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 9
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
- +$145M total (a16z) — top of the agentic financial-crime category
- +Consolidates 11 fraud/KYC/AML vendors into one platform
- +Auto-reviews 40% of monthly applications — major cost reduction
- −Enterprise focus — not priced for SMB fintechs
- −Regulatory complexity requires legal review per deployment
- −Best ROI requires existing high-volume transaction flow
Pricing
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
- +Fraud + AML core agents
- +4 integrations
- +Standard SLA
- +Full agent suite
- +Unlimited integrations
- +Custom rules engine
- +EU/US data residency
- +On-prem option
- +Dedicated CS
Which one should you pick?
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Pick Sardine if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Sardine →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Make.com Agents or Sardine in 2026?+
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Sardine if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Make.com Agents for primary work and Sardine for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Make.com Agents and Sardine?+
Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9; Sardine starts at Subscription. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Make.com Agents or Sardine?+
Sardine is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Make.com Agents and Sardine also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- ツール利用メモリDemo · hover to play
Visual no-code platform for building always-on agent workflows.
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェントブラウザ操作
Demo · hover to play"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
Demo · hover to play