重要な情報を自動的にキャプチャし浮き上がらせる、自己組織化型 Memory AIエージェント。
メモリRAGツール利用
Demo · hover to play
Shortwave vs Torqwhich AI personal agent should you pick in 2026?
AI email client — natural-language search, summary, scheduled send, and AI-drafted replies grounded in your inbox.
RAGMemoryTool use
Shortwave vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Shortwave | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 73 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | RAG, Memory, Tool use | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Shortwave
Agent Rank
73/ 100
- 自律性
- 7
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Torq
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Shortwave
メリット
- +Best AI-native email client in 2026 — search, summarize, draft all natural-language
- +Built specifically for Gmail; faster + smarter than Gmail itself
- +Cheap relative to Superhuman with better AI features
デメリット
- −Gmail-only — no Outlook support
- −AI assistant is helpful but not yet revolutionary
- −Smaller user base means fewer integrations than Gmail/Outlook ecosystems
Torq
メリット
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
Shortwave
Free
無料
Personal
- +Basic AI summary
- +90-day search
おすすめ
Plus
$9/月
Individuals
- +Unlimited search
- +AI assistant
- +Scheduled send
Business
$14/席/月
Teams
- +Shared inboxes
- +Send delegation
- +Admin controls
Torq
Pro
カスタム
Mid-market SOC
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large SOC
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Shortwave
Pick Shortwave if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Shortwave →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Shortwave or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Shortwave if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Shortwave for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Shortwave and Torq?+
Shortwave starts at Freemium · from $9; Torq starts at Subscription. Shortwave is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Shortwave or Torq?+
Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Shortwave and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
Notion 内蔵の AIアシスタント — 文書の作成・要約・ワークスペース検索、および連携データ上でのエージェント実行。
RAGメモリツール利用Demo · hover to play通話を記録・要約してアクションへと変換するミーティングノートエージェント — ナレッジワーカーのパーソナルCoS。
メモリツール利用音声Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Shortwave · alternatives to Torq
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison