Clinical-documentation agent that turns doctor-patient encounters into compliant EHR notes.
音声メモリRAG
Demo · hover to playAidoc vs Decagonwhich AI support agent should you pick in 2026?
Always-on radiology agents that triage CT and MRI anomalies across hospital workflows.
VisionMemoryRAG
Aidoc vs Decagon — specs
| Spec | Aidoc | Decagon |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 57 / 100 (C) | 73 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Vision, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Aidoc
Agent Rank
57/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Decagon
Agent Rank
73/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Aidoc
メリット
- +$414M total funding — most-funded radiology AI vendor
- +Always-on triage across CT/MRI; alerts critical findings within seconds
- +PACS + Epic + Cerner native integrations across major hospital systems
デメリット
- −High implementation lift — typically 3-6 month deployment
- −Vendor lock-in concerns once integrated into clinical workflows
- −No public pricing — enterprise sales only
Decagon
メリット
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
デメリット
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
Pricing
Aidoc
Department
カスタム
Imaging centers
- +1-2 modalities (CT/MRI)
- +PACS integration
- +Standard support
おすすめ
Health System
カスタム
Hospitals
- +All modalities
- +Multi-site deployment
- +Clinical liaison
Enterprise
カスタム
IDNs
- +Custom AI agents
- +Strategic CS
- +On-prem option
Decagon
Growth
カスタム
Mid-market
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Enterprise
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
Which one should you pick?
Decagon
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Decagon →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Aidoc or Decagon in 2026?+
Pick Aidoc if its specific capabilities (Vision, Memory) match what you need. Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Aidoc for primary work and Decagon for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Aidoc and Decagon?+
Aidoc starts at Subscription; Decagon starts at Subscription · Free tier. Decagon is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Aidoc or Decagon?+
Both Aidoc and Decagon are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Aidoc and Decagon also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Demo · hover to play
Ambient clinical agent for documentation, coding, and EHR workflows in 35+ languages.
音声メモリRAG
Demo · hover to playコールセンター向けエンタープライズ音声アシスタント — 自然な会話で顧客対応を完結。
音声ツール利用メモリRAGDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Aidoc · alternatives to Decagon
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison