AIカスタマーサービスエージェント — チャット・メール・音声を横断してチケットを解決し、測定可能な自動解決率を実現します。
RAGツール利用メモリ音声
Demo · hover to play
Decagon vs Langdockwhich AI support agent should you pick in 2026?
Conversational support agents that resolve tickets like your best reps.
Tool useMemoryRAG
Decagon vs Langdock — specs
| Spec | Decagon | Langdock |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 73 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription · from $30 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Decagon
Agent Rank
73/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Langdock
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 10
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Decagon
メリット
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
デメリット
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
Langdock
メリット
- +GDPR-native — built EU-first with German data residency and strict compliance defaults
- +Multi-model BYO (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google) without lock-in
- +Strong agent builder + connector library — Glean-class but priced for European mid-market
デメリット
- −Smaller US presence and US partner ecosystem
- −Newer than Glean — fewer published US Fortune 500 case studies
- −Per-seat pricing adds up at scale (>50 users)
Pricing
Decagon
Growth
カスタム
Mid-market
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Enterprise
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
Langdock
Free
無料
Individuals
- +1 workspace
- +GPT-4o + Claude
- +Limited connectors
おすすめ
Pro
$30/席/月
Teams
- +Multi-model BYO
- +All connectors
- +Agent builder
Enterprise
カスタム
Large EU orgs
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated EU tenant
Which one should you pick?
Decagon
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Decagon →Langdock
Pick Langdock if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Langdock →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Decagon or Langdock in 2026?+
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Langdock if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Decagon for primary work and Langdock for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Decagon and Langdock?+
Decagon starts at Subscription · Free tier; Langdock starts at Subscription · from $30. Decagon is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Decagon or Langdock?+
Decagon is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Decagon and Langdock also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
Multilingual customer-support AI agents with local deployment teams in 30 countries.
ツール利用メモリ音声RAGIntercom に内蔵された解決件数ベースのAIエージェント。実際に対応を削減した件数分だけ課金されます。
RAGツール利用メモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Decagon · alternatives to Langdock
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison